Curggr - 22 January 2020 10:26 PM

UNC 98 - 22 January 2020 09:10 PM

Isn’t Schiff the one who said Trump definitely colluded with Russians only to find out he did not? Why choose him for impeachment? He’s a proven liar.

When you stand up there and talk about things that have been investigated with no findings, your whole talk should be stricken from the record, and you should be censured - after being censured for his public statements during the Mueller investigation and for the so-called parody in the House.

Yep.  They’re not focusing on the actual articles of impeachment. They are using this political trial as a platform for the Russia Hoax.

Why not get get Hunter Biden and Joe Biden to testify.  If there is no proof that nothing wrong was done then Trump has a big problem.  If the Bidens are as dirty as is believed then Trump has leverage.

I can’t believe the Whistle Blower was not compelled to testify during the House inquiry.

It doesn’t matter, if Biden is the nominee. Trump is going to make sure the nation knows about the Bidens with a relentless media blitz

CU_Tigers4life - 23 January 2020 09:14 AM

Curggr - 22 January 2020 10:26 PM

UNC 98 - 22 January 2020 09:10 PM

Isn’t Schiff the one who said Trump definitely colluded with Russians only to find out he did not? Why choose him for impeachment? He’s a proven liar.

When you stand up there and talk about things that have been investigated with no findings, your whole talk should be stricken from the record, and you should be censured - after being censured for his public statements during the Mueller investigation and for the so-called parody in the House.

Yep.  They’re not focusing on the actual articles of impeachment. They are using this political trial as a platform for the Russia Hoax.

Why not get get Hunter Biden and Joe Biden to testify.  If there is no proof that nothing wrong was done then Trump has a big problem.  If the Bidens are as dirty as is believed then Trump has leverage.

I can’t believe the Whistle Blower was not compelled to testify during the House inquiry.

It doesn’t matter, if Biden is the nominee. Trump is going to make sure the nation knows about the Bidens with a relentless media blitz

Exactly…Biden is relevant because if there’s the appearance of impropriety, as Obama officials cautioned there was, then looking into it is warranted. Also, if being President doesn’t make you above the law, then running for office certainly doesn’t grant you immunity either (even for Democrats, despite some opinions) - particularly as a recent government official.

Ah yes you got it all figured out. PT Barnum would be proud of the scoutmaster who doesn’t believe in the scout ethos and the non serving cunt who is such a bitch he runs everytime he is challenged.

I thought the whistleblower didn’t have firsthand knowledge. You want him testify?
If only there was a law about whistleblowing, and if only EVERYTHING the whistleblower said was fully corroborated by all those folks who you all used to claim didn’t have firsthand knowledge. Heresay!

As for the Bidens the only problem with your genius political strategy is the they broke no laws, and no person has claimed they did, and unfortunately for your team President did. Weird no US entity was interested in an investigation…which is why Trump tried to corruptly have one started by blackmailing a weak foreign country in need. I did see why you want to shift the attention from the guilty party though.

Thanks for showing you neither understand the charge, not the fact that your own side doesn’t contest that the President is guilty is charged. It just doesn’t count right? cause of process….apparently the one that was followed exactly as the constitution prescribed.

But sure let’s get the Bidens both to testify. Fine with me. Bolton, Pompeo, all of them. I mean you want the truth right? Let’s make sure we get Uday and Qusay both in there too along with Ivanka and Jared. It’s in the transcript!!! Exactly.

Strange your team doesn’t want that. If they only had you two high schoolers to advise them. Bawhahahahah.

Exactly…Biden is relevant because if there’s the appearance of impropriety, as Obama officials cautioned there was, then looking into it is warranted. Also, if being President doesn’t make you above the law, then running for office certainly doesn’t grant you immunity either (even for Democrats, despite some opinions) - particularly as a recent government official.

Curggr, Biden’s already said he isn’t going to testify.  He doesn’t want it to come out how he used his position as VP to get his son jobs in which he had no qualifications for.

If they decide to allow witnesses, I want them all.  Let both sides bring in anyone they want since the House apparently failed to do it’s job.

Please show your evidence on how Biden used his influence?

You don’t have any? Oh ok.

SoPinesHeel - 23 January 2020 12:10 PM

Please show your evidence on how Biden used his influence?

You don’t have any? Oh ok.

That’s why you investigate.  ABC News sure as hell open the gates

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH_sdTC7Anw

If there was something improper done why would the president not have one of the 520 agencies he oversees do the investigation?
Why was the President only interested in the announcement of the investigation?
Why was aid illegally held if there was no quid pro quo?
What qualifications do the Trump kids have to be in their positions?
Why do they illegally have security clearances?
Laura Ingraham didn’t tell you to answer these questions?

Man it’s hard being surrounded by dumb people who make you feel smart and then finding some guy on a message board knows more than you huh?

Damn qualifications.

Wait, I’m supposed to follow links?
You never do. Why should I?

Why would I follow a story from June anyhow? Did you think this was somehow breaking news? Man dates are hard to read.

So let’s say it’s all true and his dad helped him get the position. So what?

When did you get concerned about nepotism? Why are you only concerned about things when you think a Democrat did it?
So just to be clear here…according to you Biden is guilty of not committing a crime but President Trump did commit one and violated the oath of his office and does so daily but there should be no penalty for that?

Man what a good scout leader you are.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trump-backed-allegations-biden-credible-testified-us-official/story?id=66807238

I’d run from the abcnews story too. Good move.

When your supposed exonerating witness says your whole theory and excuse is not credible that’s not a good sign for your team.

But it’s not like the truth has ever been on your side. Member when the truth was the right side to be on? A great philosopher who many claim to hold dear once said that. I read a book about him once.

I think it was called “two” Corinthians. Did I capitalize that right?

Figured as much.

Nothing?

You turning into a cunt like that other Clemson bitch who slithers around here and gets his ass beat every time he shows up? He is an embarrassment to his husband but I at least gave you a little credit for showing back up every time I humiliated you.

Oh no?
Just a couple of big talking vaginas who get proven wrong and then run huh. Oh well.
Typical Trumpers. Dish it out, get your ass beat and then run.

Maybe you can declare intellectual bankruptcy to keep with the Trump theme.

I would run from the ABC story too.  Good move.

Damn..I struck gold..I got 3 rapid fire replies off of this and called me “cunt”...Damn, I’m good.

#metoo

Figured it was an accurate description for a droopy sagging wet hole who doesn’t stand for anything and can’t respond to any point.

Glad you like it, but if you actually read, I used to think you weren’t. Guess you are admitting it’s accurate?

Speaking of qualifications…did you actually go to Clemson?

You didn’t?

I’m shocked.

CU_Tigers4life - 23 January 2020 12:16 PM

SoPinesHeel - 23 January 2020 12:10 PM

Please show your evidence on how Biden used his influence?

You don’t have any? Oh ok.

That’s why you investigate.  ABC News sure as hell open the gates

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH_sdTC7Anw

Hmmm. ABC sees it as a valid question and Obama officials warned it looked bad, yet it continued until questions were asked. The stoppage seems curious.