If I didn’t read it, I was able to guess that you were talking about something that wasn’t actually in it. I either comprehend what I read well, or I comprehend the nature of your arguments well.
Umm… you do neither. Are you writing what you mean to say?
I’ll let you read it again tough guy since you need help. Again…I get you will excuse anything your boy does. No surprise. It’s what has allowed him to get away with everything. I’m just gonna point out what a piece of shit you are for doing it.
Newsflash, if what Biden did was so wrong why has no American agency investigated him? Why does the President need to send his personal lawyer to dig dirt on his political rival from a country who is being accused of having corrupt prosecutors???? Why would you ever bring up your political rival in that conversation?
Wouldn’t you like to know more? Actually. No. We know you don’t. Can you imagine actually standing up for what is right for once? Of course that would involve standing up for your country. Not your strong suit is it now.
Umm… you do neither. Are you writing what you mean to say?
I’ll let you read it again tough guy since you need help. Again…I get you will excuse anything your boy does. No surprise. It’s what has allowed him to get away with everything. I’m just gonna point out what a piece of shit you are for doing it.
Newsflash, if what Biden did was so wrong why has no American agency investigated him? Why does the President need to send his personal lawyer to dig dirt on his political rival from a country who is being accused of having corrupt prosecutors???? Why would you ever bring up your political rival in that conversation?
Wouldn’t you like to know more? Actually. No. We know you don’t. Can you imagine actually standing up for what is right for once? Of course that would involve standing up for your country. Not your strong suit is it now.
As I said, I read it - another link doesn’t change what it says unless your link does show a linkage between the aid and investigating Biden.
Given the performance of those at the top of the FBI in recent years, I’m not sure their investigation or lack of into political affairs really means a lot.
I’m happy to know more. I just differ from you in that I think knowing more should come before impeachment versus pursuing impeachment before you know.
Again, why do you keep telling me how little you know? I post a link because it shows that the president said exactly what you claim he didn’t. The fact that you can’t understand that is your problem. Of course your boy loves the “poorly educated” so be glad he has you to carry water for him.
All that has happened is the Speaker of the House said the House is officially doing an impeachment inquiry. They have informally been doing it up until now actually performing their constitutional duties of oversight of this corrupt administration. Not surprised you don’t understand that either, not that you looked away as the previous house leadership looked the other way and shirked their duties.
Oh and to your shot against those entrusted to protect us, our law enforcement did their damndest to stop a corrupt administration from covering foreign interference into our elections and cheating us all out the will of the public. They can’t help a political cult that will do anything to smear rivals and cover their cult leader. Your defense of that says more about you than it does them, but of course I already knew what a freeloader you were.
People like you who have never done anything for our country should shut the fuck up about those who have sacrificed much to protect us from this kind of corruption. Of course if you did that you wouldn’t be the piece of shit you are so no surprise you take that shot.
Again, why do you keep telling me how little you know? I post a link because it shows that the president said exactly what you claim he didn’t. The fact that you can’t understand that is your problem. Of course your boy loves the “poorly educated” so be glad he has you to carry water for him.
All that has happened is the Speaker of the House said the House is officially doing an impeachment inquiry. They have informally been doing it up until now actually performing their constitutional duties of oversight of this corrupt administration. Not surprised you don’t understand that either, not that you looked away as the previous house leadership looked the other way and shirked their duties.
Okay, where in there does it say that?
Yes, they have been doing it informally - following up on what has already been investigated for years.
Trump says we do a lot for you. Then he says I want you to do this investigation of my rival. Nevermind he suspended aid before the call which you still haven’t acknowledged.
That is pressuring a foreign leader to dig dirt on a political rival. It’s as wrong as wrong can be.
Oh and to your shot against those entrusted to protect us, our law enforcement did their damndest to stop a corrupt administration from covering foreign interference into our elections and cheating us all out the will of the public. They can’t help a political cult that will do anything to smear rivals and cover their cult leader. Your defense of that says more about you than it does them, but of course I already knew what a freeloader you were.
People like you who have never done anything for our country should shut the fuck up about those who have sacrificed much to protect us from this kind of corruption. Of course if you did that you wouldn’t be the piece of shit you are so no surprise you take that shot.
I took at shot at the leadership - some of whom have been fired and others currently under investigation and that we know have leaked information with a clear political bias. The administration that was in office when it all happened was Obama.
Haha! For the record, it was you that started the name calling….LOL!
Trump says we do a lot for you. Then he says I want you to do this investigation of my rival. Nevermind he suspended aid before the call which you still haven’t acknowledged.
That is pressuring a foreign leader to dig dirt on a political rival. It’s as wrong as wrong can be.
So it doesn’t link the aid to the investigation, as you agreed earlier, you’re inserting that based on your hatred of the President.
The political rival served as Vice-President and had a pretty significant interaction that got someone fired (who was reportedly investigating a company said rival’s son was making a lot of money from), in exchange for a billion dollars in aid. He clearly made that link, but Trump is corrupt for asking about it? It wasn’t a random request into a political rival. Biden may not have done anything wrong, and I’m not convicting him, but there’s reason to ask a question. The State Department had warned prior to this that Biden’s role there looked like a conflict of interest.
What did you think of the DNC researcher reaching out to the Ukrainian Embassy for dirt and assistance in the 2016 campaign - confirmed by the embassy? Was that okay?
