3 of 6
3
Since the Mueller report has cleared Trump from Russian collusion….
Posted: 27 March 2019 09:12 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 31 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6363
Joined  2009-09-09
SoPinesHeel - 27 March 2019 05:38 PM

Nah, not bitching about anything. Just reminding you what you are…

But please keep telling me how Jesse Smollet is innocent. Prosecutor said so.

“Lock her up!”

 


Sport, the Prosecutor that dropped the charges believes he’s guilty:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jussie-smollett-prosecutor-guilty_n_5c9b5cdce4b08c450cceaad6


It seems in some goofball way you are attempting to compare Trump’s situation to Smollett…That’s a stretch..

With Trump, the Liberals created a Crime and then created an investigation to try and fill in the blanks to make it stick..

Smolett’s case in not in the same solar system to Trump and for you to compared the two is pretty desperate.

If I was you I would put the Trump Collusion Crack Pipe down and run from it…


If you want to talk about Smollett on it’s own merits that’s fine.

 Signature 

I’ve SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It’s a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing “I’m an Oscar Meyer Wiener”.

Edgar Friendly….

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 March 2019 09:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 32 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4036
Joined  2008-10-29

The question posed was did the Trump campaign coordinate Russian interference. Mueller’s report says there is no evidence of such. What you need to see beyond that is useless. The question left open is whether he obstructed justice. Since their was no guilt, how can there ultimately be obstruction? If by obstruction the report claims it’s right to question the president was not honored. That is not a defined issue. I’ve come to realize if Trump had done anything he’d need to be held to account. What Mueller’s report says is he didn’t do anything. Of all the indictments made…. none had anything to do with Russians. It can be twisted to suit any opinion, I guess. One thing is for sure.. no matter how it turns out minds were made up long ago.

 Signature 

A great wife, two wonderful girls, and an ever improving golf game. Gray hairs not withstanding!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 March 2019 10:45 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 33 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8682
Joined  2008-10-29

As always CU, I’d say you were purposely trying to say things that aren’t true like the people you support do, but your amazing lack of knowledge and innaccurate statements that you repeatedly make really just show you have trouble grasping the facts. Either that or simply don’t understand them. Either way it’s fine. I appreciate you making my point for me though.

As for the rest, you guys sure are experts on a report you haven’t read or seen…

 Signature 

“Looks like the upper hand is on the other foot!”
- President Tug Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux (1993)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 09:39 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 34 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3870
Joined  2009-01-07

Definitely not an expert on the report, but I do know it said there was no collusion. If that wasn’t what it said, I’m pretty sure we would’ve heard from Mueller and Rod Rosenstein. As for obstruction, Mueller didn’t recommend indictment or exonerate. Barr and Rosenstein, who is clearly not a fan of Trump, decided there wasn’t enough to bring a charge. What did he obstruct, as far as I can tell, Mueller was able to do the investigation freely and completely as he saw fit?

The Smollet case and this case are not even close to similar. That’s a stretch that abandons any critical thought to impugn others because the Russia claim turned out to be a hoax.

Smollet
Investigators started with a reported crime and followed the evidence
Charges were brought
Grand jury indicted on 16 felonies
Prosecutors were ready to prosecute
The connected people in the system intervened to drop charges


Trump
Investigators started with a claim and looked for to see if they could find evidence of a crime being committed
No charges were brought
Never went to a grand jury because there was no evidence
Prosecutor recommended no indictment
The connected people used unreliable evidence to try and get charges

Really, the main similarity is that in both cases, it was Trump and/or his supporters that were accused of an initial crime, and in both cases it was a hoax.

 Signature 

“I won’t support any sport where you sit on your ass and go backwards.”

Coach Frank Howard when asked to support a rowing team at Clemson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 10:10 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 35 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6363
Joined  2009-09-09

Now that the report is out, the Trump administration is going on the offense and wants to examine the origins of this inquisition.  That could get very uncomfortable for a lot of people on both side of the political aisle.  Trump, with all of his character flaws, is a clear and dangerous presence to the establishment politicians way of life.  That’s where the real collusion may be.

 Signature 

I’ve SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It’s a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing “I’m an Oscar Meyer Wiener”.

Edgar Friendly….

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 11:35 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 36 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3870
Joined  2009-01-07

Indeed. There are some nervous people right now, and Trump is not one of them.

 Signature 

“I won’t support any sport where you sit on your ass and go backwards.”

Coach Frank Howard when asked to support a rowing team at Clemson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 12:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 37 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6363
Joined  2009-09-09

As for Smollet, the Feds may take a turn on him.

 Signature 

I’ve SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It’s a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing “I’m an Oscar Meyer Wiener”.

Edgar Friendly….

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 04:39 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 38 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8682
Joined  2008-10-29

Most of what you just stated is either factually incorrect or at best not verifiable since you are making claims about a report you haven’t seen…but again it’s fine. It’s not like you would have believed anything if it had gone the other way.

I don’t give a shit about Smollet. I think he is guilty as hell as I imagine you do too, it’s just funny that dropping charges on him means nothing to your opinion but somehow declining to prosecute without you seeing anything of the report means Trump is innocent of everything despite grand juries in multiple jurisdictions still working on a plethora of potential crimes and his close advisors being charged with felonies and going to prison.. As I have said repeatedly I’m sure you think R Kelly is innocent and Al Capone never bootlegged or murdered anyone. I mean they were either found innocent or never charged…

The idea that you think Trump isn’t sweating legal troubles is so laughable I don’t even know how to respond. Why did he try to discredit things for the entire time? Why so much lying? Are those the things innocent people do? Notice that Manafort hasn’t had his state trial that Trump can’t pardon him for yet? Cohen is still talking and Flynn has yet to be charged? The kids have been refererred to the AG of New York so Trump can’t pardon them. That’s just the criminal stuff. The more he claims he is going to seek revenge for the FBI doing exactly what it’s supposed to do, the better. Why you guys want to point out to me what a crock of shit the supposed “law and order” party is, I will never understand. I already knew it anyhow.

Amazing what an R behind someone’s name will do to your convictions and standards.

 Signature 

“Looks like the upper hand is on the other foot!”
- President Tug Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux (1993)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 04:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 39 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6363
Joined  2009-09-09

Would you like to add some Jaywalkers I saw?  I did see someone park in a Handicap spot and walk in an area that says Keep off the Grass.

Your list is growing more and more to take you further and further from Trump.

Matters of local law enforcement are very different that the handling the leader of the United States.  Ironically you picked three people that all have one thing in common: Chicago….Interesting.

 Signature 

I’ve SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It’s a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing “I’m an Oscar Meyer Wiener”.

Edgar Friendly….

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 05:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 40 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8682
Joined  2008-10-29

His national security advisor is now a felon. His campaign chairman is going to prison. He overruled the professionals and forced them to give his kids security clearances when they were unable to earn them because they are compromised. His personal fixer is testifying against him and you are silent. He pays off porn stars he cheats on his wives with and then he lies to America about it.

His own kids have claimed that they were able to get cash for golf courses when no bank would lend them money from Russia. He praises Putin and puts down his own intelligence services. He insults war heroes and has a history of cheating people. He still won’t admit that the Russians wanted him to win and aided that when the same report you claim clears him apparently says exactly that according to the summary.

He literally picked an attorney general whose main claim is that the president cannot be indicted for a crime! If he was so innocent why does he try to discredit things right up until they side for him and then they are great.

You are either stupid to claim that is “jaywalking” or just a partisan who doesn’t care about right and wrong.
I get it man, you will excuse any wrong doing by your team but weirdly get all upset when Hillary Clinton gets let off. Some of us just have higher standards for our leaders.. I’m sorry you don’t. I just wish you didn’t get to claim you were patriotic or really a good guy. You aren’t. The fact you are trying to “own me” when all I want is for a fraud who lies and cheats and hurts our country to be punished.

 Signature 

“Looks like the upper hand is on the other foot!”
- President Tug Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux (1993)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 05:12 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 41 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3870
Joined  2009-01-07

It’s quite simple and not about an R. With Smollet, I saw evidence that was presented, and the grand jury did as well and returned 16 indictments. With Trump, all along I said I would wait and see what the evidence said. I said I heard a lot of accusation and innuendo but hadn’t seen evidence of collusion, but I would see what the evidence said. The special prosecutor, after 2 years of investigation, supported the point that the evidence wasn’t there and no indictments were made on collusion. Saying now that there isn’t evidence to support collusion is no longer based on my limited information, it’s supported by someone that investigated everything, so to come on here and mock people for that and claim partisanship is ridiculous.

 Signature 

“I won’t support any sport where you sit on your ass and go backwards.”

Coach Frank Howard when asked to support a rowing team at Clemson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 05:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 42 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8682
Joined  2008-10-29

So you think Hillary Clinton was innocent then too? Got it.

 Signature 

“Looks like the upper hand is on the other foot!”
- President Tug Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux (1993)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 05:37 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 43 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3870
Joined  2009-01-07
SoPinesHeel - 28 March 2019 05:23 PM

So you think Hillary Clinton was innocent then too? Got it.

No, because we have clear evidence that she was not and mounting evidence that the FBI and DOJ were in the tank and not going to let her be charged.

Her case is more similar to Smollet where we have clear evidence that was presented and someone intervened to keep it from going forward.

 Signature 

“I won’t support any sport where you sit on your ass and go backwards.”

Coach Frank Howard when asked to support a rowing team at Clemson

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 05:40 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 44 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6363
Joined  2009-09-09
Curggr - 28 March 2019 05:37 PM
SoPinesHeel - 28 March 2019 05:23 PM

So you think Hillary Clinton was innocent then too? Got it.

No, because we have clear evidence that she was not and mounting evidence that the FBI and DOJ were in the tank and not going to let her be charged.

Her case is more similar to Smollet where we have clear evidence that was presented and someone intervened to keep it from going forward.

Hillary got Jessee Smollett justice.  They looked the other way.

 Signature 

I’ve SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It’s a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing “I’m an Oscar Meyer Wiener”.

Edgar Friendly….

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 March 2019 05:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 45 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  8682
Joined  2008-10-29

Sure…where would anyone every get the idea that you were partisan?

One investigation? 37 indictments most of which relate to russia, are of Russians, lying about talking to Russians or money laundering for Russians all of people orbiting Trump. Definitely nothing to do with Russia.

The one resulting in no charges and after two years of Republicans chanting lock her up and investigating her for a decade? Nothing. Definitely she is the guilty one.

Good thinking Mr Non partisan. So stupid.

 Signature 

“Looks like the upper hand is on the other foot!”
- President Tug Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux (1993)

Profile
 
 
  
3 of 6
3