Proposal The Modify CFB Transfers
Posted: 31 January 2018 10:15 AM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5073
Joined  2009-09-09

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/proposal-to-let-athletes-transfer-instantly-after-a-coaching-change-picks-up-steam/


The highlight is a proposal to allow players to transfer if their coach (I’m assuming Head Coach) either leaves or gets fired.  It also prevents coaches from locking kids out of certain schools to transfer to.

This is a 2-edge sword and I lean against it.  We don’t need a wild west in college football….The only “upside” I can see is compelling a school to not be so fast to fire a coach or risk losing your players.

I like the graduate rule in place..it compels the player to finish his education so he can transfer.

 Signature 

“I’ve trained myself not to laugh or smile. I watched a hundred hours of the Three Stooges; every time I felt like smiling or laughing, I jabbed myself in the stomach with a cattle prod.”

—Col. Flagg From M*A*S*H

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2018 12:09 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3922
Joined  2013-01-17

I like the new rule and think it’s more fair for the kids, which this should be about.  A kid shouldnt have to lose a year of elligibility if a school pulls a bait and switch on them.  Big difference between playing with Meyer or Muschamp. 

In regards to transfer locations that’s garbage too.  Conferences cover entire regions.  It’s unfair for a coach or school to limit a kids educational and athletic options due to a fear of competition.  Stop making kids scrap a year just to get to the school they want.

 Signature 

2016 National Champs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2018 12:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5073
Joined  2009-09-09

As much as I hate using the NFL as a comparison I will in this case. Since college players are more and more wanting to be treated like the pros, then I will submit that NFL players don’t get to change teams when their coach gets fired or quit because they have a contract like a college athlete has a scholarship…I think “walk-ons” paying there own bills ought to be able to go where ever.

Should a school be able to put a “franchise tag” on a college player if the coach leaves?

It’s a worthy issue that deserves modification, but the school needs to be protected on their investment of bring a kid to their school, educating, housing,feeding as well…Perhaps the school that takes this kid should have to reimburse the school that he is leaving like a coaches buyout?

 Signature 

“I’ve trained myself not to laugh or smile. I watched a hundred hours of the Three Stooges; every time I felt like smiling or laughing, I jabbed myself in the stomach with a cattle prod.”

—Col. Flagg From M*A*S*H

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2018 01:25 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3922
Joined  2013-01-17

What?!?!?!  Reimburse what a 20k scholarship ?  That’s absurd.  They are fine blowing $10,000,000 to fire a coach but need to be reimbursed for expenses incurred by players? 

As you are expecting, this is NOT the NFL where players are bought and paid for.  To my knowledge kids on academic scholarships can transfer at will.  Why not athletics? 

The schools are not the ones that need protection here.

 Signature 

2016 National Champs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2018 01:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5073
Joined  2009-09-09

Let’s Dabo finally takes the Alabama gig one day and 15-20 guys that are among our elite players decides to transfer on top of the players we lose to graduation and the NFL….you are okay with that?..That could literally obliterate any program for years.

Don’t say that many wouldn’t leave at one time..the potential is there if allowed.

I am just throwing some “what-if’s”...

 Signature 

“I’ve trained myself not to laugh or smile. I watched a hundred hours of the Three Stooges; every time I felt like smiling or laughing, I jabbed myself in the stomach with a cattle prod.”

—Col. Flagg From M*A*S*H

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2018 02:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3922
Joined  2013-01-17

Yes because this isn’t about me it’s about the kids.  Could it suck for me?  Yea.  But it’s not life changing like it can be for the kids. 

Also this is the exception to the rule.  It’s far more likely for a coach to get canned by the school since everyone’s expectations are too high now.  Slowing down the firing of coaches would help stabilize cfb and this would improve that trend.  I would make my one exception is if coaches and schools let the contract expire they can keep the kids.  Just trying to keep everyone honest. 

I do think a coach shouldn’t be able to quit AND take kids with him.  Then schools would buy kids through coaching hires.  How much would tOSU and Texas pay for Bama’s coaching and players as a package? A LOT.

 Signature 

2016 National Champs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2018 02:22 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5073
Joined  2009-09-09

Most kids transferring aren’t doing it for the academics…I think most Power 5 schools provide a fine education if you are speaking to the student aspect but I get what you are saying.

I think the Grad rule allowing kids with their degree to transfer is in the best interest of the student because it compels him to graduate.

I have been throwing out some extreme thoughts just to provoke discussion but where I am realistically is something to the effect that I would allow kids to transfer if the coach gets fired.  You may actually pick up a few extra kids that are staying away because a coach is on the “Hot Seat” and won’t commit because he’s afraid of the coach getting fired…..I would require a grace period to allow the player to meet the new coach and to have a cooling period before making an emotional decision.

I would not allow a transfer on a coach that takes another job.  I would qualify that for circumstances like the Willy Taggert situation where a coach only spent one year before jumping ship..Maybe after a coach has been at a program for 4-5 years let the buyer beware before he commits.

I think these are fair.

 Signature 

“I’ve trained myself not to laugh or smile. I watched a hundred hours of the Three Stooges; every time I felt like smiling or laughing, I jabbed myself in the stomach with a cattle prod.”

—Col. Flagg From M*A*S*H

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 February 2018 03:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3914
Joined  2011-02-04

How about if the head coach is replaced, you have to play for the new coach for 1 season and then you can transfer if it does not work out. The graduate rule is still in effect.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 February 2018 04:35 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  7807
Joined  2008-10-29

I don’t think the current rules are too bad but I think there should be some kind of appeals process for when a certain coach is just being an A hole.

 Signature 

“Looks like the upper hand is on the other foot!”
- President Tug Benson, Hot Shots! Part Deux (1993)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 February 2018 12:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  659
Joined  2010-06-05

Aren’t scholarships year to year?

While a few coaches/schools like to claim otherwise, the reality is that a scholarship can be pulled after any year (I think). Therefore, kids should be able to move on after a year, just like schools can determine to move on if they so choose.

My solution is this:

1) Kids should be allowed to transfer and not lose eligibility at any point.
2) Conferences should restrict transfers to/from other in-conference schools.

This gives the players freedom with their talents, but also somewhat protects teams from having to face the frustrated player who transferred in-conference because he didn’t get to play his first season.

 Signature 

Go Noles.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 February 2018 08:19 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3922
Joined  2013-01-17

Why worry about playing frustrated players?  Its dumb to force a kid from NC to go out of state when he has 3 other options just so he’s not in the ACC.  Plus you’re forcing him to downgrade his educational level by going to the SEC.  Is every program really one or two players away from being sabotaged by a transfer?  Doubt it.

 Signature 

2016 National Champs

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 February 2018 09:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5073
Joined  2009-09-09

I am 100% against unrestricted transferring .  This would create an environment of colleges poaching players from other schools and it would become a circus.  It would create a huge environment of hostility between schools and it’s just not necessary.

I have no problem with requests for transfers on a case by case basis in the event of coaches being assholes, putting the player in danger, the school being on probation and that player wan’t involved…common sense stuff.

College football is in very good shape and if you keep tinkering with it you risk screwing it up.

Give them 5 years complete eligibility and allow them to transfer anywhere outside of their conference once the graduate.  That will compel them to speed up and graduate in three years and still have 2 years of eligibility if they want to stay.

 Signature 

“I’ve trained myself not to laugh or smile. I watched a hundred hours of the Three Stooges; every time I felt like smiling or laughing, I jabbed myself in the stomach with a cattle prod.”

—Col. Flagg From M*A*S*H

Profile