2 of 2
2
I Have a Strong Disagreement With The Penn State Ruling.
Posted: 24 July 2012 02:21 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2392
Joined  2010-12-23

screw ‘em.

 Signature 

>>>─────;;;─►

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 July 2012 02:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4440
Joined  2008-11-01

Not sure some things can be explained on this site as there are page after page saying the same thing.

Sandusky pimped the children out to large Penn State “DONORS”. A donor means someone who gives money to the university, this aids the football program. So when Paterno, Spanier, Schultz and Curley tried to hush it up they were aiding and abetting criminal actions that aided the football program.

Sandusky was taking the children into athletic showers and raping them, taking them to bowl games and bringing them into Penn State press boxes. Penn State was used to facilitate rape and trafficking children over state lines. Everyone knew about this. The brand name facilitated this. This is really not that difficult.

More than likely you will not hear much about Curley, Schultz or Spanier again as we are probably looking at a whitewash. Spanier is even now working at DHS.

 Signature 

It is not heaven on earth and angels are not running the show. Logic is your friend. We cannot all be students of logic but we should at least strive to be a casual fan. GMOs are banned in 50 countries, we cannot even get them labeled as we continue to dance with the elephant in the room. With each new dog and pony show we dance the dance like we were the homecoming queen.

Profile
 
 
  
2 of 2
2