Clemson and FSU should be ashamed of themselves.  What in the name of Hell makes you think you can compete outside of the All Cupcake Conference?

Nobody gives a rats behind at winning 10 games if you cannot win on the big stage!

Clemson’s season is 10 wins of tomato cans and zero wins against quality opponents…I should not use FSU as a quality opponent but I did in this case.

CUT4L’s sunshine pumping will met with an extremely visceral response from me if his tries that typical stuff.

As far as I am concerned, Dabo and Chad Morris failed miserably.  Venables actually did a good job defensively, but received no support from our so-called great offense.

As I said, we go beat by backups and we are now the bitches of USC until further notice.

and I won’t even trash talk ya…

TheBoro86 - 24 November 2012 11:52 PM

and I won’t even trash talk ya…

Might as well.  Hell, I’ll join you!

_ClemScott_ - 24 November 2012 11:54 PM

TheBoro86 - 24 November 2012 11:52 PM

and I won’t even trash talk ya…

Might as well.  Hell, I’ll join you!

I haven’t been on the boards much, so I haven’t earned the right to trash talk and sound like a band-wagoner, which you know I’m not, but others on here don’t…  It was a good game (for me) ...and yes, some of the officiating was questionable going both ways… but…. there’s next year….

The Refs didn’t affect that game.  Clemson’s offense getting shut down was the game

TheBoro86 - 24 November 2012 11:52 PM

and I won’t even trash talk ya…

Would be poor form to trash talk after a game when nobody trash-talked going into the game.

This game played out exactly like I said it would.  SCAR was strong where we were weak, & our D made a collection of backups look like world-beaters.  Gotta disagree w/you about the defense, CS…they were as sh*tty as usual.  What made it so bad was the fact that The Chad put together an uncharacteristically flat game plan & made no adjustments.  Not enough Sammy or Ellington & WAY too many designed runs for Tajh.  Hell, this game was tailor-made for Humphries.  W/the pressure SCAR was getting he would have KILLED on screens & slants.

SCAR’s been a good opponent the last few years, so I wouldn’t really have cared if we played well & lost…it’s games like this where we beat ourselves that I can’t F’N stand.

TheBoro86 - 24 November 2012 11:57 PM

_ClemScott_ - 24 November 2012 11:54 PM

TheBoro86 - 24 November 2012 11:52 PM

and I won’t even trash talk ya…

Might as well.  Hell, I’ll join you!

I haven’t been on the boards much, so I haven’t earned the right to trash talk and sound like a band-wagoner, which you know I’m not, but others on here don’t…  It was a good game (for me) ...and yes, some of the officiating was questionable going both ways… but…. there’s next year….

That is the classiest winners post I have seen from an SeC fan in a long time. I wish there were more like you.

4schitzngrins - 25 November 2012 12:29 AM

TheBoro86 - 24 November 2012 11:52 PM

This game played out exactly like I said it would.  SCAR was strong where we were weak, & our D made a collection of backups look like world-beaters.  Gotta disagree w/you about the defense, CS…they were as sh*tty as usual.  What made it so bad was the fact that The Chad put together an uncharacteristically flat game plan & made no adjustments.  Not enough Sammy or Ellington & WAY too many designed runs for Tajh.  Hell, this game was tailor-made for Humphries.  W/the pressure SCAR was getting he would have KILLED on screens & slants.

Agreed.  The defense did what we expected, the offense and gameplan failed.  When Boyd was rolling out and we had time to throw it we could pick them apart.  I hated seeing all of the designed Boyd runs.