1 of 2
1
Global warming is a HOAX!!
Posted: 30 January 2009 12:50 AM   [ Ignore ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  539
Joined  2008-10-29

This is for you TBE. But then again.. what the hell does this guy know…. he only created the weather channel.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/29/weather-channel-founder-blasts-gore-global-warming-campaign/

 Signature 

2010 National Champions

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 January 2009 01:00 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  560
Joined  2008-12-11

Yea since the Globe isn’t warming anymore, it’s called “climate control”... what a joke

 Signature 

“We gave everything we had,” UVa running back Mikell Simpson said. “Everything.”... 42-13

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 January 2009 02:01 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  330
Joined  2008-10-30

Actually JWEB ... you are citing a FOX News Story.. so I am sure TBE will dismiss that as propaganda. 

But as liberals do.. When things are proven wrong,, just come up with a good catch all like Climate Change (hence the climate always changes since that is what climate does) and BAM   you are on board… how can you not be.. the Climate is changing.

 Signature 

Rocky Top You’ll Always Be Home Sweet Home to Me!!!!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 January 2009 02:50 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5463
Joined  2008-10-28

http://www.yahoonews.com

Arctic’s thaw brings security risks for NATO

By DAVID STRINGER, Associated Press Writer David Stringer, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 50 mins ago
NATO’s Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer speaks to representatives of NATO AP –

REYKJAVIK, Iceland – NATO will need a military presence in the Arctic as global warming melts frozen sea routes and major powers rush to lay claim to lucrative energy reserves, the military bloc’s chief said Thursday.

NATO commanders and lawmakers meeting in Iceland’s capital said the Arctic thaw is bringing the prospect of new standoffs between powerful nations.

“I would be the last one to expect military conflict — but there will be a military presence,” NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer told reporters. “It should be a military presence that is not overdone, and there is a need for political cooperation and economic cooperation.”

The opening up of Arctic sea routes once navigable only by icebreakers threatens to complicate delicate relations between countries with competing claims to Arctic territory — particularly as exploration for oil and natural gas becomes possible in once inaccessible areas.

De Hoop Scheffer said negotiations involving Russia, NATO and other nations will be key to preventing a future conflict. The NATO chief is expected to meet Russian Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov next week for talks.

The United States, Russia and Canada are among the countries attempting to claim jurisdiction over Arctic territory alongside Nordic nations. Analysts say China is also likely to join a rush to capture energy reserves.

“Several Arctic rim countries are strengthening their capabilities, and military activity in the High North region has been steadily increasing,” de Hoop Scheffer told delegates.

Some scientists predict that Arctic waters could be ice-free in summers by 2013, decades earlier than previously thought. De Hoop Scheffer said trans-Arctic routes are likely to become an alternative to passage through the Suez or Panama canals for commercial shipping.

“Climate change is not a fanciful idea, it is already a reality, a reality that brings with it certain new challenges, including for NATO,” de Hoop Scheffer said.

The NATO chief said an upsurge in energy exploration — and the likelihood of more commercial ships needing emergency rescue — would require a larger NATO presence in the Arctic.

“The end of the Cold War resulted in a marked reduction in military activity in the High North — Iceland would like it to stay that way,” Iceland’s outgoing Prime Minister Geir Haarde told the conference.

Haarde tendered his resignation Monday amid the country’s economic crisis and said the one-day conference was among his final duties before he steps down on Saturday.

Lee Willett, head of the maritime studies program at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based military think tank, said that as routes open up, warships from nations seeking to defend claims on energy resources will follow.

“Having lots of warships, from lots of nations who have lots of competing claims on territory — that may lend itself to a rather tense situation,” Willett said. “We may see that flash points come to pass there more readily than elsewhere in the world.”

Russia and Canada have already traded verbal shots over each other’s intentions in the Arctic, and Canada has beefed up its military presence in the region, announcing plans to build a new army training center and a deep-water port in contested Arctic waters. Norway, the U.S. and Denmark also have claims in the vast region, while Russian President Dmitry Medvedev seeks to lay claim to Arctic territory the size of France.

Six people were arrested on Wednesday outside the Reykjavik conference venue — two for burning a NATO flag. Many Icelanders oppose the volcanic island’s membership in the military bloc, fearing it compromises the nation’s independence.

 Signature 

“Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then they beat you with experience.”

TB12, the most mis-understood poster on Southernpigskin.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 30 January 2009 02:57 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5463
Joined  2008-10-28

http://www.weatherchannel.com

Q&A;: Jim Cantore Senior Meteorologist The Weather Channel

Written By Rick Ellis, Friday, December 4th, 2008

Jim Cantore joined the fledgling Weather Channel right out of college in 1986. He’s worked there ever since, becoming the network’s most recognizable personality. Cantore has been lauded for his ability to “break down” complicated weather events into terms that the average viewer can understand.

He recently answered some questions about his career, and the new Weather Channel series “When Weather Changed History.”

Q: One of the changes I’ve noticed over the past twenty years is that The Weather Channel has really expanded viewer’s interest and knowledge of the weather. Is this something you’ve noticed as well since you’ve been with the network?

A: We would not be able to survive by just maps alone. It’s been important for our network to show the viewers what we are predicting as well as explain to them why. As we move forward we have to get more interactive by taking emails and phone calls and being able to answer questions on the fly. Our viewers are very smart and ask great questions.

Q: You’re well known for being someone who seems to always be in the heart of the storm coverage. Have there ever been any times when you were worried about your safety?

A: Never

Q: This is a bit of a related question. I recently spoke with some storm chasers, and they said that one of the things that worried them was that they would run into novices who would just see a tornado was happening nearby, and decide they were going to drive over and take a look. Is this something you’ve ever noticed? Do “civilians” sometimes underestimate the danger you can get into during extreme conditions?

A: Sometimes I don’t get that close to notice that others may be in trouble. Viewers need to understand that when we set up for a broadcast, we know we’re in the safest location for coverage after researching. Civilians always underestimate the danger until they are in it. It’s the old, “it can’t happen to me’” adage.

Q: Can you talk a bit about your work with the Fragile X Research Foundation?

A: My two children have Fragile X Syndrome.

FRAXA is a non-profit organization run by parents of kids with Fragile X syndrome ( the most common known cause of Autism ) FRAXA’s mission is to find effective treatments and a cure for all children and adults with Fragile X. FRAXA has funded over $12 million in research at universities around the world.

Q: One of the challenges of your job is the amount of time you have to spend away from your family. You’ve been doing this a long time, and I know that you might have the best job a meteorologist can have. But I wonder if you see a time when you might travel less, or just try some new things?

A: I love being in the field and people expect me there. I love forecasting the weather and being able to teach the viewer. Truth is, TWC has let me do it all. I would be lying if I didn’t tell you my commitment has taken its toll on my family. This is a very difficult decision. If the viewers told me they would rather see me in the studio more showing them the maps the meteorologists look at and also be out in the “big ones” that would be a perfect fit.

Q: It seems difficult sometimes to talk about global warming without getting into a political argument. But do you have any thoughts about the subject? As a meteorologist, do you see weather being affected by a change in climate?

A: The earth is warming. Are humans accelerating that process? I believe yes. Can the earth correct what we have done? Maybe. The key is to continue to educate people on how to take care of our planet, convince other countries they have to participate in CO2 reductions and alternative energy, and relay the impacts of global change as we feel more confident of there imminent impact. The issue I believe we will see first is more long-lived heat waves and droughts. Then we will see the sea level rise. These are the two biggies we will deal with in our lifetime.

Q: Besides your duties with the Weather Channel, I understand that you also make an appearance in an entrance video that’s used by the Stockton, CA Thunder Hockey team. How did that come about?

A: They thought I would be a perfect fit. I agree.

Q: What can viewers expect with “When Weather Changed History”? What will they learn from the show?

A: The show looks at the power of nature and its incredible impact on history, offering often-surprising effects of weather on historic events and revealing moments in history when the forces of weather intertwine with the forces of human nature to influence the course of history. This is a launch event like no other for The Weather Channel, with repeat episodes and an interactive component at http://www.weather.com/history that includes a fun history quiz and a chance to win an exciting trip for four in our online sweepstakes.

Q: What are some of the most significant historical events that have been influenced by the weather?

A: The premiere episode on the space shuttle Challenger recalls the tragic day in recent history that a lot of people remember. The series also focuses on events such as Operation Eagle Claw, which occurred during the Iran-Contra hostage crisis in 1979, and the Battle of the Bulge in World War II, which was a true struggle of man against the power of nature and weather - and the danger of underestimating that power.

 Signature 

“Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then they beat you with experience.”

TB12, the most mis-understood poster on Southernpigskin.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2009 06:44 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3220
Joined  2008-10-29

I wish we could have global warming just during winter. That would be nice!

 Signature 

I’m quite lucky. I have a lovely wife, two great kids and an ever improving golf game.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 January 2009 06:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5463
Joined  2008-10-28

I wish we didn’t have it all. And when the ice breaks off in Alaska and beach areas up and down the east coast are gone you’ll understand why.

 Signature 

“Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then they beat you with experience.”

TB12, the most mis-understood poster on Southernpigskin.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 February 2009 04:17 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2914
Joined  2008-11-23

Global warming will happen if we like it or not.  No one can stop mother nature.  And we as humans are not following through with any of our plans to help postpone it.  It may be here before we know it, well maybe during the second half of our lives.

 Signature 

“I havn’t been a part of a team since I was with The 4 Peters”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 February 2009 01:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2039
Joined  2008-11-05

The earth goes through cycles… Warm and Cold.  Now we are going through a warming cycle.  Like Sarge said…  Its going to happen if we are here or not.

 Signature 

GO NOLES!!!

“It ain’t easy bein’ cheesy!!!!”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 February 2009 06:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  3884
Joined  2008-10-29

I beleive the earth will take care of itself…unfortunately it might get rid of us to do so. I think we could all agree that clean air and energy independence is a benefit to everyone. Why is there so much opposition to this? Believing in global warming or not, the results of reducing polution and consumption make our country stronger.

 Signature 

Ted Striker: “My orders came through. My squadron ships out tomorrow. We’re bombing the storage depots at Daiquiri at 1800 hours. We’re coming in from the north, below their radar.”
Elaine Dickinson: “When will you be back?”
Ted Striker: “I can’t tell you that. It’s classified.”
- Airplane! (1980)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 February 2009 04:40 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2039
Joined  2008-11-05
SoPinesHeel - 02 February 2009 05:15 PM

I beleive the earth will take care of itself…unfortunately it might get rid of us to do so. I think we could all agree that clean air and energy independence is a benefit to everyone. Why is there so much opposition to this? Believing in global warming or not, the results of reducing polution and consumption make our country stronger.

Im down with Clean air and energy independence.

 Signature 

GO NOLES!!!

“It ain’t easy bein’ cheesy!!!!”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 February 2009 11:58 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2914
Joined  2008-11-23

I see windmills behind every house in the future lol

 Signature 

“I havn’t been a part of a team since I was with The 4 Peters”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 February 2009 02:40 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5463
Joined  2008-10-28

http://www.yahoo.com

Washington, D.C., and other coastal U.S. cities could find themselves under several more feet of water than previously predicted if warming temperatures destroy the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, a new study based on a model predicts.

The West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) towers about 6,000 feet (1,800 meters) above sea level over a large section of Antarctica. It holds about 500,000 cubic miles (2.2 million cubic kilometers) of ice, about the same amount of ice contained in the Greenland Ice Sheet.

This vast swath of ice is the anchor for numerous glaciers that drain into the polar sea and is bounded by the Ross and Ronne Ice Shelves. Whether or when this ice sheet might melt is still very uncertain, but even a partial melt would have a bigger impact on some coastal areas than others.

The new research found that sea level rise would not be uniform around the globe, owing to odd gravitational effects and predicted shifts in the planet’s rotation.

Collapse concern

Throughout hundreds of millions of years in Earth’s past, polar ice caps have grown and receded in cycles lasting thousands or even hundreds of thousands of years. When caps melted, seas rose.

What’s different today is that melting of ice at both poles is occurring faster than what has naturally occurred in the past.

Some scientists are worried that our current path of warming could cause the collapse of all or part of the WAIS over the coming decades or centuries. These worries have been further fueled by a recent study in the journal Nature that indicates that more of the WAIS is warming that was previously thought.

“The West Antarctic is fringed by ice shelves which act to stabilize the ice sheet - these shelves are sensitive to global warming, and if they break up, the ice sheet will have a lot less impediment to collapse,” said co-author of the new study Jerry Mitrovica, of the University of Toronto and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.

In its most recent report, released in 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that a full collapse of the ice sheet would raise sea levels by 16 feet (5 meters) globally.

Mitrovica and his colleagues say that this is an oversimplification, and that sea level rise will be higher than expected, and greater in some places than in others.

In particular, the IPCC estimate ignores three important effects of such a massive ice melt:

  * Gravity: Like planets and other cosmic bodies exert a gravitational pull on each other, huge ice sheets exert a gravitational pull on the nearby ocean, drawing water towards it. If an ice sheet melted, that pull would be gone, and water would move away. In the case of the WAIS, the net effect would be a fall in sea level within about 1,200 miles (2,000 km) of the ice sheet and a higher-than-expected rise in sea levels in the Northern Hemisphere, further away.
  * Rebound: The WAIS is called a marine-based ice sheet because the weight of all that ice has depressed the bedrock underneath to the point that most of it sits below sea level. If all, or even some, of that ice melts, the bedrock will rebound, pushing some of the water on top of it out into the ocean, further contributing to sea level rise.
  * Earth’s rotation: A collapse of the WAIS would also shift the South Pole location of the Earth’s rotation axis (an imaginary line running through the Earth from pole to pole -about 1,600 feet (500 meters) from its present location. This would shift water from the southern Atlantic and Pacific oceans northward toward North America and the southern Indian Ocean.


Mitrovica and his fellow researchers took these effects into account and came up with a new projection of what would happen across the world if the WAIS melted out. Their findings are detailed in the Feb. 6 issue of the journal Science.

“The net effect of all of these processes is that if the West Antarctic Ice Sheet collapses, the rise in sea levels around many coastal regions will be as much as 25 per cent more than expected, for a total of between 6 and 7 meters [20 to 23 feet] if the whole ice sheet melts,” Mitrovica said. “That’s a lot of additional water, particularly around such highly populated areas as Washington, D.C., New York City, and the California coastline.”

Submerging threat

Six meters of sea level rise would eventually inundate the nation’s capital, because even though it doesn’t have an extensive coastline, it was originally a low-lying, swampy area connected to the Chesapeake Bay.

It would also put virtually all of south Florida and southern Louisiana underwater. The West Coast of North America, Europe and coastal areas around the Indian Ocean would all be inundated more than previously expected.

 Signature 

“Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then they beat you with experience.”

TB12, the most mis-understood poster on Southernpigskin.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 February 2009 06:25 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  821
Joined  2009-01-09

Here are a few articles about how big snakes get and the warmth of environment.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090204112217.htm
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-sci-snake5-2009feb05,0,6550292.story
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/feb/04/snake-giant-fossil-titanoboa

I think this evidence speaks for itself.  Those “Anaconda” films were not too far off.

 Signature 

“The conduct of Cam Newton’s father and the involved individual is unacceptable and has no place in the SEC or in intercollegiate athletics,” said Mike Slive, Southeastern Conference commissioner. “The actions taken by Auburn University and Mississippi State University make it clear this behavior will not be tolerated.”
RULED ELIGIBLE BY SEC AND NCAA, DOUBLE-STANDARD

2010 Auburn Tigers (14-0)*

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 February 2009 06:33 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  560
Joined  2008-12-11

I’ll agree that the Earth is warming but it’s a natural process that just happens and personally, I feel that humans have little to no effect on the process and I don’t like it used as a political tool

 Signature 

“We gave everything we had,” UVa running back Mikell Simpson said. “Everything.”... 42-13

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 February 2009 06:45 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5463
Joined  2008-10-28
Mountain West - 09 February 2009 05:25 AM

Here are a few articles about how big snakes get and the warmth of environment.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/02/090204112217.htm
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-sci-snake5-2009feb05,0,6550292.story
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/feb/04/snake-giant-fossil-titanoboa

I think this evidence speaks for itself.  Those “Anaconda” films were not too far off.

omg those are some big snakes!!! surprised

 Signature 

“Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then they beat you with experience.”

TB12, the most mis-understood poster on Southernpigskin.com

Profile
 
 
  
1 of 2
1